<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>:::..S U P A R I . O R G..:::</title>
	<atom:link href="http://supari.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://supari.org</link>
	<description>We Speak the TRUTH, Do You Dare ?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 06:05:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>44 Month jail for not paying maintenance</title>
		<link>http://supari.org/44-month-jail/</link>
		<comments>http://supari.org/44-month-jail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 06:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sunita</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Roshan Dalvi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maintenance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://supari.org/?p=2425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He was awarded with 44 months jail for not paying maintenance court oredered to pay to wife, so another 44 month he will be in Jail,because of that he will not be able to earn to pay so he will be jailed another 44 month&#8230;..
Now you know Indian judges are A$$ ****.
MUMBAI: Coming to the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://supari.org/44-month-jail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pay fine if failed to appear in court</title>
		<link>http://supari.org/pay-fine/</link>
		<comments>http://supari.org/pay-fine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 09:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sunita</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADJ Lau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gurbax Singh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay fine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://supari.org/?p=2422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NEW DELHI: Seeking repeated adjournments and not appearing before the court to follow up his own complaint has landed an NRI in trouble. Irked by the conduct of a Canada-based NRI, who had filed a civil suit in the capital two years ago, a trial court has slapped a fine of Rs 1.5 lakh on [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://supari.org/pay-fine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No sanction required to prosecute erring police official: Delhi HC</title>
		<link>http://supari.org/sanctions/</link>
		<comments>http://supari.org/sanctions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 09:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sunita</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SI Rarnbir Singh]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://supari.org/?p=2419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New Delhi: No sanction is required from the government to prosecute a police official accused of custodial violence, the Delhi High Court has said while sentencing a cop to 10 years of imprisonmnet for torturing a person to death.
A Division Bench headed by Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul turned down the plea of a former Delhi [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://supari.org/sanctions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bar Councils comes under RTI to public scrutiny: CIC</title>
		<link>http://supari.org/bar-councils/</link>
		<comments>http://supari.org/bar-councils/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 09:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sunita</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A N Tiwari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bar Councils]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central Information commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right to Information Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rti]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://supari.org/?p=2416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Bar Councils are open to public scrutiny under the Right to Information Act (RTI) and should set-up a mechanism to facilitate processing of applications directed to them under the transparency law, the Central Information Commission (CIC) has held.
The Bar Council of India and Bar Council of Punjab and Haryana had rejected several RTI applications [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://supari.org/bar-councils/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RTI activist killed by corrupt officials</title>
		<link>http://supari.org/satish-shetty/</link>
		<comments>http://supari.org/satish-shetty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 04:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sunita</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anna Hazare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arun Mane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contract killers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RTI Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RTI movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandip Shetty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vijay Kuvalekar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://supari.org/?p=2413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pune: &#8220;The swords that pierced Satish Shetty did not just kill an Right to Information (RTI) activist, but also stabbed the spirit of democracy.&#8221;
This poignant expression of anti-corruption crusader Anna Hazare sums up the sense of despair that has taken over social activists after the 38-year-old Shetty, who fearlessly used RTI Act to expose various [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://supari.org/satish-shetty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Office of Chief Justice comes under RTI</title>
		<link>http://supari.org/cji-office/</link>
		<comments>http://supari.org/cji-office/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 08:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sunita</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chief Justice AP Shah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chief Justice of India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justices S Muralidhar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right To Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vikramjeet Sen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://supari.org/?p=2410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NEW DELHI: The Delhi High Court on Tuesday upheld its single bench order that the office of the Chief Justice of India (CJI) comes within the purview of the Right to Information (RTI) Act and details of judges assets should be revealed under that. 
A bench comprising Chief Justice AP Shah and Justices S Muralidhar [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://supari.org/cji-office/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Indian Politicians under RTI scaner</title>
		<link>http://supari.org/rti-scaner/</link>
		<comments>http://supari.org/rti-scaner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 05:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sunita</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ashok Rawat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bhaskar Prabhu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mahiti Adhikar Manch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rajbir Singh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RTI Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 8(1)(j)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shailesh Gandhi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://supari.org/?p=2407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MUMBAI: After politicians and judges of Supreme Court, now the assets of babus have been prised open to public scrutiny. In a landmark order, the Central Information Commission has said that disclosure of information such as assets of a public servant, routinely collected by the public authority, should be made available to the public under [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://supari.org/rti-scaner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nephew of President of India demanded Dowry ?</title>
		<link>http://supari.org/rahul-g-patil/</link>
		<comments>http://supari.org/rahul-g-patil/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 05:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sunita</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[498a]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dowry demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dowry harassment case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dowry law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inspector K V Srinivas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prachi Singh Patil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President of India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Pratibha Patils nephew]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rahul G Patil]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://supari.org/?p=2402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Pratibha Patils nephew Rahul G Patil is under investigation by the Bangalore Police in a dowry harassment case. Hailing from Uttar Pradesh and a resident of Navi Mumbai, Prachi Singh Patil has filed a 498 (A) case against her husband Rahul G Patil and his family in Byappanahalli police station under the jurisdiction of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://supari.org/rahul-g-patil/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bombay HC circular -Preference to Above 60</title>
		<link>http://supari.org/above-60/</link>
		<comments>http://supari.org/above-60/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 04:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sunita</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Above 60]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advocate M P Vashi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advocate Vinod Sampat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice R.M. Lodha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senior citizen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://supari.org/?p=2399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A little-known circular issued by the Bombay high court promises to bring respite to senior citizens, who have been caught in the web of litigations. The HC has decided that preference should be given to cases where either of the parties involved in the court matter has attained the age of 60 years and above.
The [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://supari.org/above-60/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amendment to CrPc</title>
		<link>http://supari.org/amendment-crpc/</link>
		<comments>http://supari.org/amendment-crpc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 08:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sunita</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crpc 372]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DGP S P S Rathore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ruchika Malhotra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 357A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 372]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 376A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 376D]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://supari.org/?p=2393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NEW DELHI: In an attempt to provide legal succour to victims of crime in India, the Manmohan Singh government on Thursday notified some crucial amendments to the Code of Criminal Procedure which, among other things, would grant victims the right to appeal against a court order absolving an accused, or convicting the accused to a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://supari.org/amendment-crpc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
