<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>:::..S U P A R I . O R G..::: &#187; News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://supari.org/topics/news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://supari.org</link>
	<description>We Speak the TRUTH, Do You Dare ?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:15:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Chennai men against Women Reservation Bill</title>
		<link>http://supari.org/chennai-men/</link>
		<comments>http://supari.org/chennai-men/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Association for Protection of Men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chennai men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D Arulthumilan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geetha Ramaseshan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shakeel Akthar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suresh Ram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women reservation Bill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://supari.org/?p=2494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ CHENNAI: Its not just Mulayam Singh and Lalu Prasad Yadav who are vehemently opposing the women&#8217;s reservation bill. In Chennai, women who believe they have a cause to celebrate this Women&#8217;s Day as the country comes close to pass the bill instead have to contend with men protesting against it in the name of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://supari.org/chennai-men/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>International custody Battle</title>
		<link>http://supari.org/custody-battle-3/</link>
		<comments>http://supari.org/custody-battle-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sunita</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bombay High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child custody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[custody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[custody battle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justices Ranjana Desai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyer Prabhjit Jauhar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mridula Bhatkar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://supari.org/?p=2491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MUMBAI: The Bombay high court, which tried to thaw a cold marital relationship of a young couple with two children in a trans-continental custody battle, shook its head in defeat on Tuesday.
It was a &#8220;herculean task&#8221; to first try and get the couple to see sense, said a bench of Justices Ranjana Desai and Mridula [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://supari.org/custody-battle-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dowry demand without Harassment is not Crime &#8211; Delhi HC</title>
		<link>http://supari.org/no-crime/</link>
		<comments>http://supari.org/no-crime/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 04:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sunita</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[498a]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[498A IPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dowry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dowry demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indian Penal Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipc 498a]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice V K Jain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Naresh Kumar Sharma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 304-B]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://supari.org/?p=2480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NEW DELHI: The Delhi High Court has held that a solitary demand not followed by any harassment of the wife doesn’t constitute a dowry demand and is not punishable under section 304 B of Indian Penal Code. Justice V K Jain gave the ruling while acquitting three members of a man’s family who had appealed [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://supari.org/no-crime/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>7 year jail for Marital rape &#8211; CJI</title>
		<link>http://supari.org/marital-rape/</link>
		<comments>http://supari.org/marital-rape/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 04:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sunita</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[498a]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CJI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domestic violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dowry law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GK Pillai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indian Penal Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice Geeta Mittal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[K G Balakrishnan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marital rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ncw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S Chatterjee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 354 (A)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 376]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual assault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WCD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://supari.org/?p=2475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Soon Every Husband in India, endup in jail for no reason. This law will give women a weapon of men destruction for FREE, if wife is not happy with husband, even she willingly had sex but next morning she can call Police for marital RAPE.
Who will judge what rape and what is not, for Indian [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://supari.org/marital-rape/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Want to get marry a Girl ? Rape her &#8211; CJI</title>
		<link>http://supari.org/rape-her/</link>
		<comments>http://supari.org/rape-her/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 11:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sunita</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chief Justice K G Balakrishnan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CJI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rape victim]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://supari.org/?p=2471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NEW DELHI: In a radical suggestion, India&#8217;s Chief Justice K G Balakrishnan on Sunday said that judges, lawyers and social activists should give &#8220;due regard&#8221; to the wishes of a rape victim if she chooses to marry the rapist or have the baby conceived from the crime.
&#8220;Judges, lawyers and social activists should also ensure that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://supari.org/rape-her/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Women can file Domestic Violence against Brothers &#8211; Delhi HC</title>
		<link>http://supari.org/dv-against-brothers/</link>
		<comments>http://supari.org/dv-against-brothers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 04:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sunita</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domestic violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DV act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protection of Women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://supari.org/?p=2466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is funniest, Crziest and most Pathetic law i ever heard, and thi scan possible only in INDIA. This is ultimate goal of Feminists is to rule the world ruining her own siblings family and Family system.
New Delhi: A woman, who is living with her brothers, can take refuge under the Domestic Violence Act in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://supari.org/dv-against-brothers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Failed 498A,Wife,Son held for Murder</title>
		<link>http://supari.org/wifeson-held/</link>
		<comments>http://supari.org/wifeson-held/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 04:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sunita</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[498a]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amit Kumar Singh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divorce case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dowry case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[false 498a]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illicit extra-marital relationship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipc 498a]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manoj Kumar Gupta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[murder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Srimati Srivastava]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://supari.org/?p=2463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GUMLA: Police have arrested wife and son of minor irrigation department assistant engineer Sunil Kumar in connection with the latter&#8217;s murder. Kumar&#8217;s Srimati Srivastava and eldest son, Sumit, were rounded by Gumla police late on Friday evening from Ranchi&#8217;s Argoda Housing Colony in connection with the murder. 
Kumar was shot dead at his official residence [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://supari.org/wifeson-held/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Girls No#1 &#8211; Sex before 15</title>
		<link>http://supari.org/sex-before-15/</link>
		<comments>http://supari.org/sex-before-15/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 11:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sunita</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mutually consensual]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pre-marital partner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pre-marital sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[premarital sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[romantic partner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex education in India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[young women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://supari.org/?p=2460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NEW DELHI: This could come as a shocker for those resisting introduction of sex education in Indian schools.
Premarital sex has been found to be common among young men but a higher percentage of women aged 15-24 years have had sex before reaching the age of 15.
A large scale youth survey conducted under the aegis of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://supari.org/sex-before-15/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Over 4,000 Taiwan men reported abuse by wives</title>
		<link>http://supari.org/taiwan-men/</link>
		<comments>http://supari.org/taiwan-men/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 10:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sunita</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abuse by wives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domestic violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[men suffer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physical abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taiwan men]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://supari.org/?p=2457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who says men ar enot harassed by their wives&#8230;.?
there are many men suffer silently but unfortunatly there is not a single law to protect such men in todays Feminists world.
Taipei, Feb 21More than 4,000 Taiwan men sought help after being abused by wives last year, the media said Sunday.
In 2009, 4,428 men called the family [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://supari.org/taiwan-men/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Courts can order CBI enquiry without states consent</title>
		<link>http://supari.org/cbi-enquiry/</link>
		<comments>http://supari.org/cbi-enquiry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 04:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sunita</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Article 21]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cbi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cbi enquiry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cbi investigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chief Justice K G Balakrishnan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.K. JAIN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fundamental rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justices R V Raveendran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[P Sathasivam and J M Panchal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://supari.org/?p=2453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court today ruled that courts have powers to order CBI probe without the consent of state governments with a rider that this should be used cautiously and sparingly. 
In a unanimous verdict, a five-judge Constitution Bench headed by Chief Justice K G Balakrishnan said such powers have to be exercised cautiously [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://supari.org/cbi-enquiry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
