WHY LAW THINK ALWAYS WOMEN IS BY DEFAULT RIGHT PERSON TO TAKE CARE OF CHILD…?
Even there are plenty of evidences, women is not capable always to take care of her own child,still Judiciary give custody to Mother, wihtout any evaluation.
For Mother, there is nothing to prove, but for Father he has to prove that he is capable to raise his children. because of these gender biased laws.
Many time women, use child as tool to get money / financial support from man,Feminist use child as a bargaining tool. so they always demand custody to mother. and law without thinking twice, give child custody to mother, Even she Alcoholic,Drug addict, criminal and murderer.
But UK law is so blind, even they found multiple wounds on 17 month old boy and mother was arrested twice,still they gave cusotdy to mother.
How many Innocent children life will these biased laws take;
How long, it will take to quench blood thirst of these FEMINISTS, who support and demand custody to MOTHER only.
WHEN OUR LAW MAKERS WILL UNDERSAND THIS.
London, Nov 13 : A shocked British government has ordered a full review of the country’s child protection measures after a court convicted a young mother, her boyfriend and another man for the terrible death by torture of a 17-month-old child.
In his short life, the boy known as Baby P endured 50 injuries – including broken bones and back – at his home in a London borough.
Child officers, police and doctors saw him 60 times, temporarily took him under their care thrice and arrested his mother twice. However, according to lawyers at the trial, Baby P still did not pass the “evidence threshold” to be taken into care. Now, after the convictions, the administration is wondering how it went wrong.
This is the second such case from the same borough of Haringey. The nation was shocked in 2000, when eight-year-old Victoria Climbi
