British Rule was Better than Indian Government

We haven’t seen these many women arrested even during Britisher’s rule![Ref: GREAT INDIA, GONE TO DOGS.]

1.2 lakh women arrested in just 4 years 2004-2007, see the table below.

Arrested Under IPC 498a




% of Women Arrested
















2007 (est. 5% increase)










Note: The average percentage of women arrested is 22.6%, which is 4 times more than the average of women arrested under all IPC sections(5.8%).
Does this mean that the incidence of women criminals are 4 times more inside Indian families than in the general population!?
Or does this anomaly mean RIGHTLY that women protection laws like IPC 498a is grossly misused, especially against women themselves, indeed these laws are misused by women criminals(who were termed as ‘Legal Terrorists’ by supreme court itself) .

2 thoughts on “British Rule was Better than Indian Government

  1. 498a& Dowry Act(3,4):more than 22% arrested are women themselves – see the statistics(as available in the NCRB sire, see links below) for women affected by IPC 498a and Dowry Death(IPC 304B).

    3,90,397 persons(of which 87,830(22.5%) were women themselves!!!) were arrested under Section 498A in 2004, 2005 & 2006 as per the data published by the National Crime Research Bureau(NCRB).

    So over 87,000 women also have been arrested without evidence or investigation in case of IPC 498a cases, in three years(2004 to 2006) so its not just a matter of Harrassed Men, its a clear case of Families in distress due to legal terrorism.

    Another point to note is that in IPC 498a and Dowry Deaths(304B) the percentage of women arrested are more than 22% of the total number of people arrested(compared to around 5.8% women in the total arrested in other crimes)

    Refer the statistics from NCRB(National Crime Research Bureau)

    Year 2004(

    Year 2005(


    Year 2006(

    Note: in the above table the statistics for yer 2007 is estimated, since NCRB data for this year is not yet available.


    NOWADAYS men are tortured in the hands of women by misusing newly formulated laws specially designed only for women. The law makers fully forgetting the constitutions article 14 which says all men and woman are equal before law or say equality before law. This article 14 giving equal strength to man and woman but formulating new law for women so for no law formulated by the law makers for men. Why?

    A fine case of one Mr. Rathinasabapathy who was married with Rajeswari of Howrah at Pondicherry on 4th June 2003 started their life initially at Pondicherry latter after five months shifted to Bangalore where he was employed. The husband arranged job for his wife and he had given her all possible freedom which include to visit her parental house, to wear the dresses she feel convenient. But his all these freedoms and love showered towards the wife resulted in one fine day with hand cuffs of iron. Do you believe? YES THIS IS A TRUE STORY. The husband who once tried his best to keep his wife happy meted the cruelty by the same women. The husband arranged all physical mental pleasures for his wife but not fulfilled one demand which is affecting his parents, unmarried brother and sister. The wife demand for separate dwelling that too in such a place the language of which is a strange thing to the husband and leaving the old aged sick parents here all alone was not welcomed by the husband and which only resulted in iron hand cuffing like a herded criminal and lying in illegal custody for eight days.

    The wife and her parents even not intimated him the child birth and somehow when he come to know the child birth he requested to send a snap of the child which was also not heard. For the new born the father send some gift which was also returned by the wife and her parents. Their cruelty reached at Himalayan peak when she lodged a complaint using the weapon of dowry and domestic violence act (DVA) and several other criminal section against husband and in-laws, the in-laws who never interfered her life. The question is if she really met cruelty by the hands of husband and his relatives why she had not opted to file a complaint in the jurisdiction police station which was only in walkable distance. She opted to file complaint in the Howrah police station and filed a divorce under section 13a and succeeded to get an expartee decree within 3 months of filing which is very impossible as per marriage law. The husband had not given time to file counter or for a counselling. When husband was attending for maintenance case and came out of the court he was arrested and handcuffed and remained in the custody for eight days and ninth day presented before the judicial magistrate and then kept one day in judicial custody and latter bailed out. The wife atlest shown curtsy by not opposing the anticipatory bail of in-laws.

    The women how she forget the sweetness of togetherness, how she forget the sweet face of her husband which is now also in front of her in the form of child.

    THE MEN WAS CRUSHED IN THE HANDS OF WOMEN. The men who is a M.Sc., M.Phil., earning sufficiently was now staring the sky with no hope for justice. His parents are weeping and sister, brother still in a stage of shock.

    The reward paid by the wife to her husband is the only result of misusing of newly formulated laws. The court at Howrah which have no jurisdiction neither to try the suit for divorce nor for the criminal offence as the couple married at Pondicherry and last resided place at Bangalore, where both of them were employed and as such alleged offence held in Bangalore. So the decree which is passed by the Howrah Court is improper and the complaint also liable to be quashed. But these all will happen in future.

    Wake and do something for men otherwise similar trouble tomorrow you also have to face. For this not only togetherness of men required but the togetherness of women also required.

    M. Rathina Sabapathy

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *